The ongoing implosion of British Imperialism



For the last two months, a dark cloud has loomed over the entirety of european imperial capital, more so over Britain than elsewhere. The looming threat of Brexit. Ever since the referendum to leave the EU ended with a decisive vote in favour of leaving, the political leadership of the UK has scrambled to find its way out of the mess they themselves have created.

The Brexit referendum, much like the Scottish independence referendum before it, comes at a time when the British economy has been in decline. Already fragile from prolonged deindustrialization, it was hit particularly hard from the global financial crisis which hit the world in 2008. The BBC reports that the period between 2008 and 2011 saw a record rise in unemployment within the UK, reaching over two and a half million unemployed in the end of 2011. The British bourgeoisie dealt with the crisis through a policy of austerity, as a consequence of which an unprecedented attack was mounted on Britain's welfare state institutions, all so that the big banks and capitalists could be kept buoyant. The result, is that now Britain is now having to witness hundreds of its poor dying of thirst and starvation. (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/two-patients-die-starvation-thirst-each-day-nhs-hospitals-uk-care-homes-statistics-office-national-a7517171.html)

The sustained attack on the institution of the welfare state and continuous support for a parasitical class of capitalists, who generate profits and not jobs, have resulted in the working class and youth being pushed to the brink, and it is but obvious that they would respond in a radical way. However, we are still faced with a global crisis of revolutionary leadership, and Britain is no stranger to this. Various bourgeois alternatives have tried to manipulate and take advantage of the discontent of the masses and steer things in their favor. Therefore, the answer to capitalism's problems were sought to be given by resorting to nationalism. The Scottish referendum was pushed by a right wing bourgeois party, the SNP, the Brexit too was favoured by a right wing bourgeois party, the Conservatives. 

Yet on the other hand, the youth and working class continued to fight back. The political scene in Britain changed after the crisis, with large students moblizations and working class actions taking place in the aftermath of the financial crisis. In 2010 London was the scene of mass mobilizations and occupations by students protesting cuts to spending in education. Even though they were not successful in their aims, the mobilization radicalized the youth. It continues to be a strong current that has not yet subsided despite the efforts of the bourgeoisie to contain and diffuse it.

Among the more precarious petty bourgeois layer of the population, and a section of the working class who are vulnerable to the economic uncertainties in modern Britain, a far right alternative emerged in popularity. It was more convenient to blame the immigrant rather than the bosses for the crisis ridden situation they faced. Unfortunately, the bulk of the left, still under the sway of pro-capitalist social democrats under the banner of the Labour party, failed to provide any adequate solutions. Ultimately, Britain has found itself pulled left right and centre by reactionary and progressive forces, all fuelled by seething discontent caused by the crisis of capitalism. Britain, which in any case had been a declining imperial power since the end of its empire over India, now sees the twilight of its existence, it is up to the working class to decide whether the nation will sink into poverty and backwardness, becoming a subordinate nation within the capitalist order, (like its former great power predecessors, Portugal and Spain) along with all the pain and suffering that comes with such a decay, or is able to revive itself by casting away the capitalist order that is sucking the vitality from the nation like a parasite over a host. 

The Referendum

When the Conservative party came to power over the promise of conducting a referendum to stay or leave in the EU, it was largely as a reaction to the dual problems of discontent and the rise of the far right, on whose support the Tories relied.

No one expected the outcome of the Brexit referendum to come with a yes, not the least the British bourgeosie. Yet, for anyone who knew of the social context in which it occured, it would not come off as a surprise. The vote was a culmination of a series of socio-economic developments within Britain beginning from the Thatcher period, through the Blairite leadership and ending with David Cameron's Prime Ministership. The trajectory is one of dismantling of the welfare state, deindustrialization, and the continued penetration of neo-liberal policies which enriched the few at the expense of the many, and simultaneously, the decline of the treacherous social democratic left, in particular the pro-liberal, establishment labour leadership. The trade union movement in britain, which was one of the strongest in Europe, led and organized by militant workers, achieved the welfare state after sustained and continued struggle over decades. The end of the first world war saw a rise in revolutionary movements all over the world, and the world bourgeoisie would respond to it, either by attempting to crush the movement, or to contain it. The welfare state was an effort to contain and defer revolution. It was also, a massive victory for the working class. The welfare state ensured a healthy, educated and more productive workforce, that need not work in precarious conditions and live in abject poverty. The British bourgeoisie of course, only tolerated it for the time being. The welfare state itself would not be a permanent solution for the British working class and poor, and indeed it could never have been so. The only permanent solution for the ills of capitalism is a socialist society. The trajectory of the dock worker's struggle and the struggles of the mine workers, shows the fundamental weakness in the leadership of the British working class, when faced with the committed reaction under Thatcher, the workers lost, though at great political cost to the capitalists.

The decades that followed saw not just a revival of power of the capitalists, but also a weakening of the power of the working class, both nationally within the Uk and internationally with the rise of reaction and the fall of the Soviet Union, unleashing a period of capitalist restoration in Eurasia. The period saw the culmination of the degeneration of the Labour Party, already built on the flawed bankrupt foundations of Social Democracy, turned completely and openly to the service of British imperial capital. In many ways Blair's Prime Ministership represents a culmination of the reaction unleashed from the Thatcher era. Practicing imperialist war abroad, and neo-liberalism at home. The vulnerability of British capitalism only increased during this period, and all the conditions which led to our present conundrum trace back to this period.

Before the referendum, Britain saw a period of far right resurgence, which in some cases resulted in violent attacks on immigrant minorities. At the other end, was a period of massive mobilization of students and youth, and the working class in the service sector, to defend the welfare state against the attacks of the capitalists. Both forces were mobilizing to a degree that was unprecedented in recent British history and to an extent it was reflected in the referendum vote itself. The North of England, home to the once thriving industries of Britain, now bankrupted and left more vulnerable than ever, felt threatened by the new realities of British capitalism.

On the other hand, a new cadre of working class, who had joined the ranks of the burgeoning service sector felt equally threatened by resurgence of the right and incensed by continued austerity and attacks on the welfare state institutions, particularly the NHS. Many of the new workforce has been migrant workforce from Asia and Africa, adding a new dimension to the class struggle in Britain.

The referendum opened up class divisions within the UK, as well as regional and racial divisions and has created political polarization which will not soon be bridged.

How we deal with this

The question of which form of imperialism is more preferable is not something revolutionary socialists concern themselves with. Our core concern is only to end capitalism and replace it with a socialist order, under the dictatorship of the proletariat.

The questions posed by the various pro-capitalist factions within Britain, revolve around 'how to manage' Brexit causing the least damage to the economy possible. What no one, not even Corbyn on the left, is saying, is that British capitalism is broken, and Brexit is simply the beginning of its inevitable implosion. Since the end of Britain's empire in India, British imperialism has been in precipitous and irreversible decline, consistently losing ground.

As it declines the British bourrgeoisie is transfering the burden of its failures on to the shoulders of the working class. The class has fought back, but the fight has not progressed yet to demands of nationalizing the banks, or even the railways. The divisions of the class, and the successes of the right in diverting class hatred to racial hatred, show the crisis of leadership.

Revolutionary forces must unite to fight this racism, while building up the forces around the struggle to defend the welfare state. At the same time, we must propose our own solutions that does not get mirred into the debates framed by the capitalists. The question for the class is not EU imperialism vs British imperialism, the question truly is Socialism or Barbarism!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela - The End of Chavism